Letter To Attorney General 11/09/2011

From PPAU Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

11 September 2011

Mr. Roger Wilkins,
Secretary
Attorney-General's Department
Central Office
3-5 National Circuit
BARTON ACT 2600


Dear Mr. Wilkins,

I write to you seeking clarification of certain issues raised in an article authored by Andrew Colley, published in The Australian on August 24, 2011 entitled ‘A-G in call for talks on online piracy’. [1]

The article cites a spokesperson for the Attorney General’s Department indicating that a meeting had been convened in order to garner the differing positions, need and scope of any governmental intervention.

It is very concerning that there has been no public mention of the meeting convened between stakeholders and that amongst the published list of invited participants there appears to be no representation from consumer organisations or civil society – in fact, the meeting appears to be convened with the specific intention to exclude these stakeholders.

It is even more concerning that organisations like the Australian Content Industry Group, and the dubious studies they have commissioned, which have subsequently been used by the Attorney General as justification for the policy direction of the Australian Government[2] and only released by the organisation after Freedom of Information requests were made by myself to the department, are being given unfettered access, facilitated by the Attorney General’s department to lobby government and industry for the development of an industry code, or to effect legislative changes.

The willingness of government ministers and the Attorney General to so readily facilitate the development of disconnection mechanisms for alleged copyright infringement like those operating in New Zealand, the UK or France, is worrying.

The termination or limitation of access to the Internet on the grounds of violation of intellectual property laws, in this case, copyright, is completely disproportionate, ineffective and a violation of human rights.

That this is done without the oversight or inclusion of civil society in an open forum begs questions regarding the integrity of the democratic process and the willingness of the government to engage and listen to alternative perspectives, economic analysis and academic study.

It is imperative that the government acts in the interest of Australian citizens, recognising the importance of Internet access, protecting the rights of Australian citizens to seek and impart information, knowledge and culture, and works to safeguard due process and fundamental rights. It can do this by being transparent and open in its decision-making and policy development process.

Notes

  1. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/a-g-in-call-for-talks-on-online-piracy/story-e6frgakx-1226120005661
  2. http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/16/mysterious-anti-piracy-report-to-be-released-this-week/; http://torrentfreak.com/secrecy-and-darkness-surround-mysterious-900m-piracy-report-110314/ ; http://torrentfreak.com/secret-australian-piracy-report-revealed-and-debunked-110316/
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Meetings
Working Groups
Official Documentation
Media
Participate
Wiki Navigation
Tools