Pirate Congress 2014/Constitutional Amendments

Constitutional amendment proposals must be presented to the National Council a minimum of 28 days before the National Congress, which this year is Friday 20 June 2014 at 11:59 pm (AEST) as per By-law 2013-03. Proposals submitted after that date will be held over until the following National Congress. Please email your proposals to [mailto:secretary@pirateparty.org.au secretary@pirateparty.org.au].

CAP-XX: Non-profit clause
Put by: Mozart Olbrycht-Palmer, on behalf of the National Council

Motion
Insert the following as Article 1(2):

Rationale
In January the National Council enacted this as a temporary operational amendment to the Party Constitution to ensure we met the requirements of a non-profit organisation for banking purposes.

It codified the existing practice. At present no member of Pirate Party Australia is paid or reimbursed, except where they incur genuine expenses on behalf of the Party. Therefore, we are already a non-profit organisation in practice.

According to Article 8.4(2) this must come before a vote at the National Congress, and it will lapse if it does not pass.

CAP-XX: Extend time between National Congresses
Put by: Mozart Olbrycht-Palmer and Brendan Molloy, on behalf of the National Council

Motion

 * Replace "twelve months" with "thirteen (13) months" in Article 2(3).
 * Replace "12 months" with "thirteen (13) months" in Article 6.1(2).
 * Replace "twelve (12) months" with "thirteen (13) months" in Article 9.1(1).

Rationale
In April the National Council enacted this as a temporary operational amendment to the Party Constitution in order to provide more flexibility when choosing the date of the National Congress.

Extending the time out to 13 months allows for the date of the National Congress to be selected according to other considerations. For example, this year the venue was not available on the chosen date, and vital organisers were not available on the original date we had hoped for. Bringing the date forward to the end of June would cause possible conflict with exams for many of our student members, and pushing it back to the end of July was unconstitutional. The temporary amendment was passed for this reason, which is why we are able to hold it closer to the end of July this year.

This amendment will provide the National Council with greater flexibility when it comes to setting the date of the National Congress.

According to Article 8.4(2) this must come before a vote at the National Congress, and it will lapse if it does not pass.

Motion

 * Delete ", for a period of no more than twelve months" or equivalent if amended by another motion from Article 2(3).
 * Replace Article 6.1(2) with:


 * Replace Article 9.1(1) with:

Rationale
The amendments to Article 2(3) and Article 9.1(1) do not remove the term limit--they merely remove points of inconsistency. Article 9.1(1) states that the term begins at the National Congress and ends at the next one, but also states a time period. This removes the time period ambiguity and links it directly to Article 6.1(2).

This wording ensures that a National Congress is always hosted in July, which has been the month used for the last 5, which also provides for enough wiggle room to not require awkward election periods of 13 months, as this would allow at most a tenure of 1 July to 31 July, and at a minimum 31 July to 1 July.

CAP-XX: Minor Corrections
Put by: Brendan Molloy

Motion

 * Replace "meeting- however" with "meeting. However, " in Article 6(3).
 * Replace "unaffiliate" with "disaffiliate" in Article 6.1(4) and Article 6(9).
 * Replace "competing in" with "contesting", and replace "Such branches would" with "These branches", in Article 2.1(2).
 * Replace "two thirds" with "two-thirds" anywhere it appears in the Constitution.
 * Replace "should" with "must" in Article 6 and all subarticles.
 * Replace Article 5.1(1) with:

Rationale
Minor typographical and grammatical error corrections. Made Article 5.1(1) read significantly better, changing some "should" to "must" and "possible" to "feasible".

CAP-XX: Remove spurious examples from and clarify Article 2(1)
Put by: Brendan Molloy and Tim Serong

Motion

 * Replace Article 2(1) with:

Rationale
Presumption of committee names in the Constitution is a bit annoying, and in the process, unnecessary implied what style of subordinate organisation that the NC would be empowered to create, which is now clarified.

Clarifies that the NC has the power to create committees, working groups and branches, as it already has. It also clarifies that a branch is considered a subordinate organisation that can be overridden by the Federal Party.

CAP-XX: Clarify Article 2(5)
Put by: Brendan Molloy

Motion

 * Replace Article 2(5) with:

Rationale
There were major grammatical flaws in this paragraph, which have been corrected, without changing the purpose behind this paragraph, by breaking it into two separate paragraphs.

CAP-XX: Update membership requirements and powers in Article 4.1
Put by: Brendan Molloy

Motion

 * Replace Article 4.1(1)(d) with:


 * Replace Article 4.1(2) with:

Rationale
Relax the requirements regarding previous party membership, as this clause has never been enforced beyond requiring the knowledge of which party the new member has come from.

CAP-XX: Clarify ambiguity of Article 6(6)
Put by: Brendan Molloy

Motion

 * Replace Article 6(6) with:

Rationale
This paragraph was grammatical flawed, with the potential to cause confusion. The purpose of this clause has not been changed beyond correcting any ambiguity.

CAP-XX: Create Article for National Congress Online Voting
Put by: Brendan Molloy

Motion

 * Delete Article 6(9).
 * Insert a subsection after Article 6.2 as 6.3.x as follows:

Rationale
The current wording is all shoved into the end of another Article somewhat as an afterthought, with rushed and difficult to understand wording. That paragraph has been expanded to a full Article for easier amendment and expansion in the future, and clarifies some edge-cases that were left ambiguous by the previous wording.

CAP-XX: Correct Ambiguity for Article 11(1) (Dispute Resolution Committee)
Put by: Brendan Molloy

Motion

 * Remove Article 11(1)(a)
 * Amend Article 11(1) to:

Rationale
Clears up some ambiguity.

Changes the voting mechanism from simple majority to optional preferential voting, as per all other officer elections. It simply cannot work (and has never been done!) for multi-candidate elections.

Removes an unenforceable clause about someone "should" be legally qualified. This can be returned in the future if we choose to reform the DRC properly.

Motion

 * Move Article 3.1.1 to become Article 4.5
 * Remove now empty Article 3.1

Rationale
This was proposed at the last National Congress but in the context of the larger document does not make sense to be placed where it has been and should be moved back to Article 4.

CAP-XX: Standardise Election of Registered Officer
Put by: Brendan Molloy

Motion

 * Remove Article 3.3.7.1(3)

Rationale
It does not make sense that this position is elected differently to the other councillors.

CAP-XX: References to legislation to be put in italics
Put by: Brendan Molloy

Motion

 * Italicise and correctly format all references to legislation in the Party Constitution

Rationale
While a little bit pedantic, we have references to legislation within the Constitution and not all of them follow the same format, nor are italicised. Even very minor changes of this nature require a constitutional amendment vote to ensure oversight.

CAP-XX: Announcement criteria for National Congress
Put by: Brendan Molloy

Motion

 * Delete "and at least seven days in advance of the National Congress" from Article 6(2)
 * Insert paragraph after Article 6.1(2):

Rationale
42 days is 6 weeks.

The current wording allows a National Congress to be called within 7 days. This is an issue for multiple reasons.

Article 8.1(2) requires that constitutional amendments are proposed 28 days prior to the National Congress, but there is no formal way to propose an amendment prior to the announcement of the meeting, making it impossible to amend the constitution if a meeting is called less than 28 days before it is expected to occur.

It is also an unreasonably short period of time to give to the members to organise flights and accommodation if the National Congress is being held as a physical event.

Also 42.

CAP-XXXX: Insert a new part: Definitions
Put by: Brendan Molloy

Motion

 * Insert the following part after Part I:

Rationale
Other parties such as the Greens have a Definitions part to their Constitution, which serves to clarify the definition of terms commonly used within the Constitution that may result in debate and confusion if not clearly defined in a central repository.

It is forseen based on our experience with PPI that debates about what constitutes a majority are a popular are of contention in close votes, so this preemptively solves this issue.

CAP-XX: Clarify some references to majorities and quorum
Put by: Brendan Molloy

Motion

 * Replace "majority" with "simple majority" in Article 6(5).
 * Replace "majority" with "two-thirds majority" in Article 6.1(4).
 * Replace "A majority vote of the" with "The" in Article 4.3(1)
 * Replace Article 3.2 with:

Rationale
The first two are merely clarifying current practices as per the new definitions part, instituting a clearly defined reference to the absolute two-thirds majority, whether CAP-XXXX carries or not.

Motion

 * Move Article 6.3 to become Article 7

Rationale
It doesn't make sense to have such an important Article shoved into Meeting Procedure and Requirements.

Motion

 * Delete Article 5.2(2)
 * Insert below Article 6.2:

Rationale
The deletion of Article 5.2(2) guarantees that all policy decisions must be voted on by the membership at the next National Congress, even if a policy is instituted by the National Council as a matter of urgency. The current wording seems to imply that the National Council could skip around this and consider a policy to be untouchable by the National Congress, when this has not been the case whatsoever by convention over the last 5 years.

This ensures that a fully-fledged National Congress is not required to be run if the National Council determines that a meeting is necessary for the consideration of policy modifications and updates.

As this Party writes very prescriptive policies, such as our energy policy, they can go out of date rather quickly and require modification. In line with our democratic duties, it makes sense to be able to host a meeting specifically to handle policy discussions exclusively. This type of meeting has been held once before in 2013 in the lead up to the election to ensure our policies were ready for the upcoming election.

This wording however guarantees that all National Congresses will allow members to propose policy amendments even the Congress isn't declared to be a Policy Meeting as such.