Minutes/General Meeting/2013-06-04

From Pirate Party Australia Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Questionable.png
Meeting Minutes
This document is a record of a meeting. Do not edit this document without contacting the relevant group first.


General IRC Meeting (#ppau)

Start: 20:01 04/06/13 AEST

Finish: 20:37 04/06/13 AEST

Rules

  • Feel free to add anything reasonable you wish to the end of the agenda, and it will be discussed.
  • There is one speaker per agenda item noted in brackets.
  • Discussion on each agenda item will commence upon the speaker finishing.
  • When you have finished speaking on your item, ask for question and comments.
  • Wait until a speaker indicates they have finished before making comments.
  • People not conducting themselves as if in a meeting will be kicked (out).

Agenda

  • TPB AFK screening Sydney
  • Developing local crews
  • Congress announcement?
  • Steven talks about vote results
  • Any other business


Attendance

  • National Council
    • David Campbell (chair)
    • Simon Frew
    • Glen Takkenberg
  • State Coordinators
    • Simon Frew (NSW)
    • Liam Pomfret (QLD)
    • Thomas Randle (Tas)
    • Krystin Dix (WA)

+ various candidates and others

Apologies

  • Mozart Olbrycht-Palmer

Minutes

TPB AFK screening Sydney

Developing local crews

  • Local crews encouraged but the rules of "no rules" isn't really working well
    • so the NC will be implementing a framework for crews to follow
    • this should hopefully help make things less confusing and get more crews up and running
    • those with any input please contact the NC with ideas via email [email protected]

Congress announcement

  • Loose ends being tied up
  • will be announced tomorrow

Steven talks about vote results

  • A potential oddity in the vote results
  • eg NSW:
    • David Campbell: Y:74 N:9 [89.16%]
    • Brendan Molloy: Y:69 N:14 [83.13%]
  • but only half actually voted
    • Brendan Molloy: 37
    • David Campbell: 27
  • Similar issues for other states
  • Issues is most likely that: people voted in the approval voting but not the ranked voting to mean "I approve of these candidates, but I don't care about order"
  • Ranking is optional, some people don't care to rank.
  • From Bendan:
    • of the voting, only a couple were technically donkeys, and two were invalid
    • randomisation of candidate order is used to stop donkey voting.


Other business

  • comments of approval on the website design
  • donations at this stage at about $320ish per month