Policy and Preselection Meeting 2013/Motions

PDC Platform and policy amendments

Put by: the Policy Development Committee

Copyright policy

Motion: To approve the Copyright policy, and replace section 2 of the Platform with the Platform amendment listed at: Copyright Policy

Patents policy

Motion: To approve the Patents policy, and replace section 3 of the Platform with the Platform amendment listed at: Patents Policy

Digital Liberties policy

Motion: To approve the Digital Liberties policy, and replace sections 6, 7 and 8 of the Platform with the Platform amendment listed at: Digital Liberties Policy

Energy policy

Motion: To approve the Energy policy, and insert the Platform amendment listed at: Energy Policy

CSG policy

Motion: To approve the CSG policy, and insert the Platform amendment listed at: CSG Policy

Tax policy

Motion: To approve the Tax policy, and insert the Platform amendment listed at: Tax Policy

Welfare policy

Motion: To approve the Welfare policy, and insert the Platform amendment listed at: Welfare Policy

Drug policy

Motion: To approve the Drug policy, and insert the Platform amendment listed at: Drug Policy

Marriage policy

Motion: To approve the Marriage policy, and insert the Platform amendment listed at: Marriage Policy

Bill of rights policy

Motion: To approve the Bill of Rights policy, and insert the Platform amendment listed at: Bill of Rights Policy

Improving electoral participation

Put by: Mozart Olbrycht-Palmer

Platform amendment

Motion: To add to the Platform, under the section "Reform of Democratic Institutions", the following text:

Improving electoral participation

Pirate Party Australia encourages the maximisation of political participation. As part of the global movement that is well known for its interest in the concepts of liquid and direct democracy, we have strived to investigate new means of political participation. We intend to seize the opportunities that modern communication technologies provide to change the nature of politics towards increased participation. However, in 2013 Parliament passed a bill amending the Electoral Act which doubled the cost of the nomination fee for contesting elections.

It was unthinkable that Parliament would pass such exclusionary measures, but now that Pirate Party Australia has been confronted with this change, there is concern that future Parliaments may continue the trend of discouraging alternative representatives. In response to this, Pirate Party Australia pledges to do all it can to restore candidate fees to a reasonable level, and to oppose legislation that would introduce further unfair burdens on candidates. The Party's full position on the issue can be found here.

("here" will be linked to the related position statement that is included in this motion).

Position statement

Motion: To adopt the following as an official position of Pirate Party Australia (including the section "References"):

Improving electoral participation

Pirate Party Australia encourages the maximisation of political participation. As part of the global movement that is well known for its interest in the concept of liquid democracy, Pirate Party Australia has strived to investigate new means of political participation. We are one of the few political parties in Australia that provides for the remote participation of members and online voting. We intend to seize the opportunities that modern communication technologies provide to change the nature of politics.

However, while the Internet particularly is opening up new methods of participation, Pirate Party Australia and other minor parties like ours exist because their members do not feel existing parties adequately represent our interests and views in Parliament. To rectify this, we and other parties contest elections. This aim is stated in our constitution.

In 2013, both houses of the Federal Parliament passed a bill amending the Electoral Act 1918 (Cth). Among other innocuous changes, the Electoral and Referendum Amendment (Improving Electoral Procedure) Bill 2012 included an amendment to the Electoral Act that doubled the nomination deposit for contesting elections. As a result, the fee per Senate candidate is $2000, while the House of Representatives is $1000, coming to a combined cost of more than $300,000 to contest every electorate and run full Senate tickets nationwide.

Pirate Party Australia views this as a serious affront to democracy. This is a deliberate stacking of future elections in favour of incumbent parties, and deprives Australians — both electors and candidates — of true democratic participation and fulfilment. This places an unfair burden on parties and candidates that do not have the same membership numbers and corporate sponsorship that well established parties enjoy. This is not conducive to a multi-party democracy, and directly effects our ability to reverse the poor decisions of previous Parliaments.

It was unthinkable that Parliament would pass such exclusionary measures, but now that Pirate Party Australia has been confronted with this change, there is concern that future Parliaments may continue the trend of discouraging alternative representatives.

In response to this, Pirate Party Australia pledges to do all it can to restore candidate fees to a reasonable level, and to oppose legislation that would introduce unfair restrictions on candidates. The Party also supports a referendum to include protection against onerous or excessive requirements on candidates standing for election to the Federal Parliament in the Australian Constitution, similar to that which appears in the Canadian Constitution. In Figueroa v Canada (Attorney General), it was ruled that several sections of the Canada Elections Act were unconstitutional as they violated section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which protects the right to play a meaningful role in the electoral process.

Pirate Party Australia recognises the need for similar protections in Australia.