User talk:AlexJago
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Potential future Constitutional Amendments
Various quorums
- Quorum amendment from total votes to Aye votes (for final-stage voting)
- This prevents the scenario where not voting might prevent quorum but voting 'Nay' (with 'Aye' majority) might create quorum.
- Instead, just say "Implicit quorum of X% of the party, times an Y/Z majority, gives a minimum requirement of XY/Z % of the party in Ayes.
- This prevents the scenario where not voting might prevent quorum but voting 'Nay' (with 'Aye' majority) might create quorum.
- It's implicit throughout all of 3.1 that Councillors not present are ineligible to vote
- 3.1 (3) for instance relies on 'Absolute 2/3 Majority' -- but who has the right to vote?
- 3.1 (4) makes no sense to me.
- Possible rewrite: 'Any vote to accept the minutes of a previous meeting requires a two-thirds majority of any present at that meeting.`
- The definition of 2/3 majority requires 7 Ayes with 9 voters,
Wiki bits and pieces
New policy page
<noinclude>{{Official}} [[Category:Policies]]</noinclude> actual content here... <noinclude>==References== <references/></noinclude>
Update outdated policy page
{{OutdatedPolicy|new=Policies/Foo_Bar#Baz}}
Redirect pages
#REDIRECT [[Foo/Bar#Baz]]
"return to contents"
[[#top|Return to contents]]